Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 11 results ...

Araujo, L G, Piña, A B S, Aidar, L A G, Coelho, G O and Carvalho, M T M (2019) Recommendations and guidelines for implementing PPP projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 262–76.

Dabarera, G, Perera, B and Rodrigo, M (2019) Suitability of public-private-partnership procurement method for road projects in Sri Lanka. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 199–213.

Hartwell, J C, Upadhyay, Y and Sourani, A (2019) Influential factors of life cycle management in education PFI projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 302–14.

Jayasuriya, S, Zhang, G and Jing Yang, R (2019) Challenges in public private partnerships in construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 172–85.

Kavishe, N, Chileshe, N and Jefferson, I (2019) Public–private partnerships in Tanzanian affordable housing schemes. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 233–47.

Marinelli, M (2019) Evaluation of PPP road projects in Greece. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 186–98.

Oliveros-Romero, J and Aibinu, A A (2019) Ex post impact evaluation of PPP projects: an exploratory research. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 315–30.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Qualitative research; Stakeholders; Project management; Impact evaluation; {[}Ex post{]} evaluation; Public–private partnerships;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 2044-124X
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2018-0036
  • Abstract:
    The purpose of this paper is to explore, in literature and practice, the use of ex post impact evaluations within the public–private partnership (PPP) context and understand the major considerations for developing a PPP ex post impact evaluation method. Design/methodology/approach This paper applies exploratory research through expert interviews from Chile and Australia to describe: the relevance of this kind of evaluation, and the challenges of designing and conducting a PPP ex post evaluation. Findings The study confirms the lack of a formal method for evaluating the impact of a PPP project. Experts agree on the relevance of performing ex post evaluations to PPP projects and that in practice there is no formal procedure to follow. Among other challenges, experts discussed four general ex post evaluation aims: transparency and accountability, PPP legitimization, industry learning and government agency learning. Research limitations/implications This study confirms the gap in knowledge and contributes to the developments of approaches to perform ex post impact evaluation of PPP projects. It also provides several suggestions that need to be addressed when attempting to evaluate PPPs beyond the financial and contractual parameters. Originality/value The topic is not fully addressed in the literature, and this study contributes to the initial discussion and development of this evaluation method, which is considered significant for the development of public infrastructure.

Pellegrino, R, Carbonara, N and Costantino, N (2019) Public guarantees for mitigating interest rate risk in PPP projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 248–61.

Umar, A A, Zawawi, N A W A and Abdul-Aziz, A (2019) Exploratory factor analysis of skills requirement for PPP contract governance. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 277–90.

Zhang, Y and Tan, W (2019) The leading small group: an institutional innovation for PPP projects in China. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 291–301.

Zhao, N and Ying, F (2019) Method selection: a conceptual framework for public sector PPP selection. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 214–32.